http://www.thecrownmanagement.com/industry-labor-foes-sound-off-during-hearing-on-nuclear-waste
Not often carry out nuclear industry executives and hardline activists who be against them agree on anything.
Mutually the two hates the thought of continuing to stockpile highly radioactive waste the reactor cores of nuclear power plants on the site of each power-generating station.
An hour-long hearing held December 2, 2013 drew almost 200 people from Ohio and Michigan to the Hilton Garden Inn in Perrysburg’s Levis Commons was a reminder that both sides are still far apart on what the government’s next step should be.
Although it would mean putting up with the waste decades longer than expected, industry and trade unions eventually want a single, national repository. Failure to develop a solution is reason enough to shut down the industry; this is the antinuclear activists claim to the government.
Nuclear power provides 20 percent of America’s electricity.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the government agency that oversees the nuclear industry, learned a lot of information, the 11th stop on the agency’s 12-city tour in which it ought to do just that: Get a cross section of opinions. As an answer to the government’s decision to unfinished plans for a national repository in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain, the NRC has been asking Americans about their thoughts regarding the agency’s proposed “waste confidence” rule and its affiliated environmental impact statement,.
As a consequence, the NRC is inquiring what the public’s thoughts concerning leaving the waste where it is, at least for the time being.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Thursday, November 28, 2013
British-Muslims contribute 31 billion pounds to economy
Britain has
more than 10,000 millionaires from among 2.72 million Muslims contributing 31
billion pounds or Rs 3.0 trillion to its economy, says a report.
‘The Muslim Pound - How Muslims Add Value to Britain’s Prosperity’ was released by the Muslim Council of Britain ahead of the just-concluded 9th World Islamic Economic Forum Meet 2013 in London, one report says.
Five decades on, there are more than 10,000 millionaires and thousands of others are engaged in higher managerial, administrative and professional occupations.
Nearly 2.8 million Muslims in the UK contribute over 31 billion pounds to its economy and wield a spending power of 20.5 billion pounds, a report said this November.
A paper from the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) said from coffee houses in Elizabethan London, to curry houses in modern day Britain, thousands of Muslim-owned businesses have made a significant contribution to the UK economy and by extension, the cultural life of Britain.
The report said there are some 2.78 million Muslims in Britain, contributing over 31 billion pounds to the economy. There is an anticipated 10,000 Muslim millionaires in the UK with liquid assets of more than 3.6 billion pounds, with more than a dozen British Muslims listed in the 2013 Sunday Times Rich List of the most affluent in the UK.
In London alone, there are over 13,400 Muslim-owned businesses in London creating more than 70,000 jobs, the paper said.
The report was published to highlight Muslims' growing contribution to the UK and to mark the 9th World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) went to London this month, the online portal Huffington Post UK reported.
The MCB report comes as Prime Minister David Cameron is set to unveil a new Islamic index on the London Stock Exchange. The move, as expected to be worth 1.3 trillion pounds next year, marks the capital's significance as a global centre for Islamic finance.
The city will be the first non-Muslim city to host the World Islamic Economic Forum.
"I welcome the effort of the British Muslim community in bringing the World Islamic Economic Forum to London. My have worked with the Muslim Council of Britain to bring this Forum to London, who has been a key delegation at World Islamic Economic Forum since its inception," said London's Mayor Boris Johnson.
The MCB is a national representative Muslim umbrella body with over 300 affiliated national, regional and local organizations, mosques, charities and schools.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
International relations: Russia rises as world leader
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/03-11-2013/126056-russia_leader-0/
Many are the references in the speeches of US Presidents about the need to "lead the world", an arrogant and intrusive approach from those elected by a percentage of their own people and nobody else. Yet today, what has America's "leadership" led to, where has it led the USA and its allies, what is its standing in the hearts and minds of the international community?
The Helsinki Final Act, or Helsinki Declaration, of 1975, was perhaps the visible face of the stance of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, looking for friendly relations with the West while it brought generations and millions of oppressed persons education, healthcare and decent public services, freeing them from the yoke of imperialist tyranny.
By 1989, the USSR was spending on average 250 billion dollars - a quarter of a trillion USD - on development projects overseas, implementing policies which guaranteed the right to basic services in countries where imperialism and colonialist policies had syphoned off the resources, placing corrupt political figures in power so as to guarantee the one-way direction of resource flow - outwards.
Scroll back seventy years, when the Russian Revolution was for the first time bringing backward societies into the front line of industrial development, guaranteeing housing, for free, free public utilities, free or heavily subsidized communications, subsidized public transportation, free primary and secondary education, free higher education, free healthcare, free dental treatment, zero unemployment, safety on the streets, security of the State, social mobility, indexed pensions, guaranteed basic foodstuffs, leisure time activities, free sports facilities, free cultural facilities... and back then we could already see the true mettle of the west.
The psyche of the United States of America, its poodle-in-chief, the UK and in turn the ex-colonies of London, principally Australia and the sickening clique of sycophants which crawl around, licking Washington's legs and feet - namely France and to varying degrees the NATO pack - is in essence Anglo-Saxonic, is based upon wanderlust, imposition of cultural values in a top-down, holier-than-thou approach which saw the same nations drawing lines on maps.
Many are the references in the speeches of US Presidents about the need to "lead the world", an arrogant and intrusive approach from those elected by a percentage of their own people and nobody else. Yet today, what has America's "leadership" led to, where has it led the USA and its allies, what is its standing in the hearts and minds of the international community?
The Helsinki Final Act, or Helsinki Declaration, of 1975, was perhaps the visible face of the stance of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, looking for friendly relations with the West while it brought generations and millions of oppressed persons education, healthcare and decent public services, freeing them from the yoke of imperialist tyranny.
By 1989, the USSR was spending on average 250 billion dollars - a quarter of a trillion USD - on development projects overseas, implementing policies which guaranteed the right to basic services in countries where imperialism and colonialist policies had syphoned off the resources, placing corrupt political figures in power so as to guarantee the one-way direction of resource flow - outwards.
Scroll back seventy years, when the Russian Revolution was for the first time bringing backward societies into the front line of industrial development, guaranteeing housing, for free, free public utilities, free or heavily subsidized communications, subsidized public transportation, free primary and secondary education, free higher education, free healthcare, free dental treatment, zero unemployment, safety on the streets, security of the State, social mobility, indexed pensions, guaranteed basic foodstuffs, leisure time activities, free sports facilities, free cultural facilities... and back then we could already see the true mettle of the west.
The psyche of the United States of America, its poodle-in-chief, the UK and in turn the ex-colonies of London, principally Australia and the sickening clique of sycophants which crawl around, licking Washington's legs and feet - namely France and to varying degrees the NATO pack - is in essence Anglo-Saxonic, is based upon wanderlust, imposition of cultural values in a top-down, holier-than-thou approach which saw the same nations drawing lines on maps.
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
The World’s Top Ten Most Dynamic Economies
Of the top 10 world economies with the highest
prospects for commerce growth in 2013, the U.S. is noticeable for its absence.
Based on Grant Thornton’s 2013 Global
Dynamism Index (GDI) involving 50 countries, the U.S. slid down from No. 10
last year, to No. 11 in 2013. And to make it worse, its stats for indicators
such as financing and labor markets, sank from a collective 64.1 in 2012 to
60.5 in 2013.
Yet, it is not that bad. U.S. left
behind the Japanese (15) and the South Koreans (13). It also crushed the U.K.,
which ranked 34 overall, scoring only 51.5 out of a perfect 100. So, things in
the U.S. are far from being that bad.
“I believe the U.S. is playing out almost
exactly the way we expected,” said Marc Tommasi, a managing director at
investment company Manning & Napier. “It is neither bright nor that
terribly bad.”
Grant Thornton’s index provides
insights into which of the 50 nations evaluated presents the best ecosystem for
investment growth. The U.S. has dropped from the charts. But it has some
company. Only a few nations have scaled the charts, and among the most stellar
performers is China. It joined the top 10 this year after having placed No. 17
in 2012.
Rankings are according to performance
in five main areas – business working environment, economics & growth,
science & technology, labor & human capital and the lending conditions.
The obvious news from this year’s
index: Asia is a powerhouse for investment growth. And even with the Nordic nations
sliding, government policies there make it one of the most ideal areas in the globe
to nurture a business. Even more so than the center of capitalism, Uncle Sam.
For China, the business working
environment and financing were both graded badly, close to the base of the stack.
However, nothing defeats the Chinese labor market. Not merely is it cheap, but
on the East Coast especially, they are exceedingly skilled as well. In addition,
in terms of holistic outlook there, China is No. 2 for general business growth.
This makes China the second highest
jumper, right behind the upcoming tiger-economy Philippines (which climbed 25
places from No. 46 last year). The progress in China is principally powered by
its science & technology ranking, where it jumped 8 places to rank 14 on
the back of stable information-technology firms and spending on research
and development.
“As China advances to a more sustainable economic development path, the
GDI 2013 results provide a major sign that our business growth environment
remains on the road to improvement,” Grant Thornton managing partner Xu Hua was cited as saying in the report published last week.
The top
10 most dynamic economies in 2012
were, namely from 1 to 10: Singapore, Finland, Sweden, Israel, Austria,
Australia, Switzerland, Korea, Germany and the United States.
Here are the top 10 most dynamic
economies of 2013.
No. 10: Norway
Norway
got 60.9 points on the index this year, down from 62.6 last year.
Multinationals have worked in Norway for so many years, most of them engaged in
the oil and gas industry. The most popular Norwegian companies are Statoil and
Norsk Hydro.
No. 9: Sweden
Sweden
stands No. 9 and gained 61.6 out of a perfect 100. Last year, Sweden's business
vitality scored a 69.6 on the Grant Thornton Global Dynamism Index, so
this year's economic deceleration in southern Europe made a dent. Swedish technology
exists in many American homes and enterprises. Ericsson is location in
Stockholm. Husqvarna lawn-mowers mow many American lawns.
No. 8: Israel
Israel
scores lower this year with 61.8 on the index compared with 69.3 last
year, losing its former No. 4 spot. Israel's growth economy is founded on
biotechnology and software. Teva Pharmaceuticals is Israeli-owned and is the largest
manufacturer of generic medicines in the world.
No. 7: Singapore
Singapore
slid down this year but remains up there. On the index in 2013, it scored 61.9
out of a perfect 100, down from the No. 1 spot last year at 72.1. The country
is generally noted as the biggest trade center in the world.
Tied with
Canada: Finland
Finland
ties with Canada with 62.3 this year, dropping from the No. 2 spot last year
with a score of 70.5. Naturally, everyone remembers Finland as the people
who gave us Angry Birds. Rovio Mobile is housed in Espoo. Microsoft adores
Finnish tech so much it acquired Nokia this year.
No. 5: Canada
Canada
and Finland both scored 62.3 out of a perfect 100 and is improving. Last year
on the index, it gained 61.7. Canada is popular as the country that gave us the
smartphone. BlackBerry is located in Waterloo. And while BlackBerry has seen brighter
days, Canada likewise hosts TD Bank and airplane manufacturer Bombardier.
No. 4: New
Zealand
That
Fly Emirates symbol printed on the jib sail of an America's Cup catamaran
belongs to Team New Zealand. The country ranked No. 4 with an index score of
62.6, sliding from 63.9 last year on the Grant Thornton Global Dynamism Index. In
spite of this lower index number, New Zealand climbed from No. 13 in
2012.
No. 3: China
China
is doing something right, climbing from Rank 20 last year to No. 3. It scored a
62.7 out of 100, up from last year's score of 61.4. China is the world's No. 2
economy, and here in the U.S., it is referred to as the economy every
politician “loves to hate”. Accused of causing massive losses of manufacturing
jobs in America and a crushing trade deficit, China is no longer merely a Happy
Meal toy-manufacturing economy. It is now noted for being a melting-pot for
luxury retailers. However, it is also popular for Internet pet-companies such
as Tencent, Baidu and Sina.
No. 2: Chile
Chile
has always been favoured by the global executive. The only thing that has
changed is that it continues to get better. Last year, it garnered No. 11 with
an index score of 63.8. This year, it is No. 2 with an index score of
64.5. Noted for its copper mining, red wine and salmon, it is also home to LAN
Airlines, the biggest airline owned by Latin Americans. Chile is good; but not
as good as these guys...
The Most Dynamic
Business Climate On Earth...
...is
Downunder. Australia climbed from No. 7 last year with an index score of 65.6
to No.1 with an index score of 66.5. Australia has so much to offer prospective
investors: twenty two years of continuous economic growth; stable institutions;
a trained, industrious labor force and a vigorous culture
of investment in research and development. The country’s most noted firms
include mining giant BHP Billiton, surf apparel and culture brand Billabong and
Rip Curl, and brewery Fosters Group. Addicted to playing fruit ninja on X Box
Kinect? It is a product of Halfbrick Studios of Australia.
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
GCHQ: inside the top secret world of Britain's biggest spy agency
http://www.thecrownmanagement.com/gchq-inside-the-top-secret-world-of-britains-biggest-spy-agency/
A couple years back, GCHQ held its yearly sports fest on Wednesday, 15 June at London’s Civil Service Sports Club. A gender-friendly, six-a-side football match was the main event of the activity, with games kicking off at exactly 11 A.M..
The day was a cheerful experience for those normally ensconced in the agency's unique doughnut-shaped command centre in Cheltenham. Participants were given a six-page list of rules and regulations to ascertain that people played fair.
"Each team MUST field at least ONE lady player at all times," the note said. "Proper footwear shall be worn. Crocs, sandals or flip-flops are not allowed. The wearing of shin-pads is REQUIRED."
Among all the extremely confidential papers about GCHQ exposed by the whistleblower, Edward Snowden, this has to be one of the least delicate. But it provides a peek into the world of the 6,100 people packed into the open-plan and underground GCHQ offices; that there is a sports activity at all shows something about the agency which many people outside their world could not appreciate.
Last year, GCHQ also made trips to the Paris Disneyland, and its sailing club participated in an offshore regatta at Cowes. The agency also has a chess club, regular pub quiz nights, cake bazaars and an in-house puzzle newsletter named Kryptos. A member of Stonewall beginning last year, GCHQ has its own Pride group for employees who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender.
There is also a paranormal group that describes itself as "GCHQ's ghost-hunting group". It is open to staff and their partners either "sceptics or believers" who want to explore "supposedly haunted properties".
Employees reckon their age on the internal directory, "GCWiki", by their "internet age", a gage of how long they have been experts on the web.
They meet friends during yearly family open-days, or through messages on the agency's own version of MySpace, aptly titles SpySpace.
Colleagues are bound to meet others cut from the same fabric. The agency's 2010/11 recruitment guide states that GCHQ hires top-calibre technologists and mathematicians familiar with the intricate algorithms that fuel the Internet. But it has space for a few accountants and librarians. No vacancies available for classicists, however.
A couple years back, GCHQ held its yearly sports fest on Wednesday, 15 June at London’s Civil Service Sports Club. A gender-friendly, six-a-side football match was the main event of the activity, with games kicking off at exactly 11 A.M..
The day was a cheerful experience for those normally ensconced in the agency's unique doughnut-shaped command centre in Cheltenham. Participants were given a six-page list of rules and regulations to ascertain that people played fair.
"Each team MUST field at least ONE lady player at all times," the note said. "Proper footwear shall be worn. Crocs, sandals or flip-flops are not allowed. The wearing of shin-pads is REQUIRED."
Among all the extremely confidential papers about GCHQ exposed by the whistleblower, Edward Snowden, this has to be one of the least delicate. But it provides a peek into the world of the 6,100 people packed into the open-plan and underground GCHQ offices; that there is a sports activity at all shows something about the agency which many people outside their world could not appreciate.
Last year, GCHQ also made trips to the Paris Disneyland, and its sailing club participated in an offshore regatta at Cowes. The agency also has a chess club, regular pub quiz nights, cake bazaars and an in-house puzzle newsletter named Kryptos. A member of Stonewall beginning last year, GCHQ has its own Pride group for employees who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender.
There is also a paranormal group that describes itself as "GCHQ's ghost-hunting group". It is open to staff and their partners either "sceptics or believers" who want to explore "supposedly haunted properties".
Employees reckon their age on the internal directory, "GCWiki", by their "internet age", a gage of how long they have been experts on the web.
They meet friends during yearly family open-days, or through messages on the agency's own version of MySpace, aptly titles SpySpace.
Colleagues are bound to meet others cut from the same fabric. The agency's 2010/11 recruitment guide states that GCHQ hires top-calibre technologists and mathematicians familiar with the intricate algorithms that fuel the Internet. But it has space for a few accountants and librarians. No vacancies available for classicists, however.
Sunday, August 11, 2013
26 Million People Struggling Financially
http://www.thecrownmanagement.com/26-million-people-struggling-financially/
Approximately 26 million Britons are presently having money problems because the economic
slump has induced a “live for the moment” mentality, based on a major report on the wellbeing of the country’s finances.
Over fifty percent of UK adults stated that they were struggling with their finances, the
government-sponsored body, Money Advice Service (MAS), bared. This is a sudden increase
from 35 percent of people who were undergoing a hard time paying their bills compared to the
previous time a similar study was conducted in 2006.
Hourly salary has plummeted by 6 percent in real value since the previous research was carried
out, making it more difficult for people to eke out a living.
A “live for the moment” culture and lack of financial smarts were also discovered to be possible
reasons.
Twenty percent of those polled stated that they would prefer to have £200 at present than
£400 after four months, with twenty-five percent of people replying they choose to live for the
present rather than plan for the future.
The report also showed that a disturbing number of Britons are deficient in financial awareness.
About 12 percent of those asked believed the Bank of England’s base rate, which has been at a
remarkable 0.5 percent low for over four years, was over 10 percent.
Over one third of the people asked did not comprehend the great effect that inflation has on
their savings and 16 percent could not tell the right balance on a bank statement.
Nevertheless, more encouraging result from the survey revealed that the number of people
checking their bank account statements had grown since 2006 and almost 84 percent of people
said they constantly monitored their finances.
40 percent of those questioned said they stay clear of doubtful dealings and 85 percent said
they were laying aside some money in savings.
Caroline Rookes, chief executive of the MAS, said: “In principle, financial management is easy –
spend less than you make and think about your future – but the challenge comes from how we
apply it in actual life.”
The MAS, an autonomous body established by the Government, has a legal duty of enhancing
public awareness and knowledge about financial issues. It plans to publish a method to assist
citizens improve their financial condition next year.
Over 5,000 people participated in the survey, with more than 70 families monitored over the
period of one year for the Financial Capability of The UK Report, which uncovered “a common
sentiment that people worry about their capability to endure until the next payday”.
Approximately 26 million Britons are presently having money problems because the economic
slump has induced a “live for the moment” mentality, based on a major report on the wellbeing of the country’s finances.
Over fifty percent of UK adults stated that they were struggling with their finances, the
government-sponsored body, Money Advice Service (MAS), bared. This is a sudden increase
from 35 percent of people who were undergoing a hard time paying their bills compared to the
previous time a similar study was conducted in 2006.
Hourly salary has plummeted by 6 percent in real value since the previous research was carried
out, making it more difficult for people to eke out a living.
A “live for the moment” culture and lack of financial smarts were also discovered to be possible
reasons.
Twenty percent of those polled stated that they would prefer to have £200 at present than
£400 after four months, with twenty-five percent of people replying they choose to live for the
present rather than plan for the future.
The report also showed that a disturbing number of Britons are deficient in financial awareness.
About 12 percent of those asked believed the Bank of England’s base rate, which has been at a
remarkable 0.5 percent low for over four years, was over 10 percent.
Over one third of the people asked did not comprehend the great effect that inflation has on
their savings and 16 percent could not tell the right balance on a bank statement.
Nevertheless, more encouraging result from the survey revealed that the number of people
checking their bank account statements had grown since 2006 and almost 84 percent of people
said they constantly monitored their finances.
40 percent of those questioned said they stay clear of doubtful dealings and 85 percent said
they were laying aside some money in savings.
Caroline Rookes, chief executive of the MAS, said: “In principle, financial management is easy –
spend less than you make and think about your future – but the challenge comes from how we
apply it in actual life.”
The MAS, an autonomous body established by the Government, has a legal duty of enhancing
public awareness and knowledge about financial issues. It plans to publish a method to assist
citizens improve their financial condition next year.
Over 5,000 people participated in the survey, with more than 70 families monitored over the
period of one year for the Financial Capability of The UK Report, which uncovered “a common
sentiment that people worry about their capability to endure until the next payday”.
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Constitutionality of Renewable Energy Mandates in Question
http://www.thecrownmanagement.com/constitutionality-of-renewable-energy-mandates-in-question-2/
In a potentially crushing strike against advocates for renewable energy mandates, a federal court ruling recently raised the issue of constitutionality of major provisions of many states’ renewable energy mandates.
On June 7, 2013, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) position against the state of Michigan (and other petitioners) in a disagreement over FERC’s proposal to distribute costs for new power lines to supply millions of megawatts of wind power in the Great Lakes area. Michigan believes that this plan would, in essence, require them to pay for expensive new power lines intended for transmitting renewable energy out of the state. Based on the law establishing Michigan’s 2008 Renewable Energy Standard, only renewable energy generated inside its state borders is qualified to fulfill Michigan’s obligation to utilize 10% of eligible renewable energy sources by 2015.
Speaking for the Court, Judge Richard Posner ruled:
“Michigan’s first argument—that its law prohibits it from crediting wind power from out of state in favor of the state’s obligated use of renewable energy by its utilities—trips over an unbreakable constitutional precedence. Michigan cannot, without violating Article I of the commerce clause of the Constitution, discriminate against out-of-state renewable energy (emphasis added).”
Thirty states, including the District of Columbia, have mandates on renewable energy that require electric companies to purchase a certain quota or percentage of renewable energy by a projected year. Just like Michigan which has a clear ban on wind produced in other states from being allowed into their mandate, other states also “discriminate” against out-of-state renewable power. When counting mandate compliance, several states count in-state power at a higher rate than out-of-state power, a practice popularly labelled as “multipliers”:
Delaware has a 300% credit multiplier for customer-sited, in-state photovoltaic (PV), a 350% multiplier for a specific offshore wind project, and a 150% multiplier for all other in-state wind projects;
Colorado applies a 1.25 multiplier for its in-state generation;
Michigan provides an extra 0.1 credit for projects that use state-available components and its local workforce;
Missouri grants a 1.25 multiplier for all in-state generation.
Kansas uses a 1.1 multiplier for all in-state resources;
Moreover, some state renewable policies have a list of renewable energy grades, where certain power sources can only be utilized to fulfill a part of the mandate. Others have grade levels dedicated particularly to in-state power generation that may now be doubtful in view of the recent decision by the federal court:
New Mexico’s Tier V applies to customer-sited resources;
Massachusetts’ Tier IV exclusively applies to in-state PV projects;
New York’s Tier II covers customer-sited resources.
The new ruling is significant since one of the main points raised by mandate proponents is the creation of jobs in the concerned state. Certainly, these claims merely consider the overall “green” jobs provided, while totally neglecting the loss of net jobs resulting from increased electricity rates arising from these mandates. The federal court ruling might just end up nullifying the argument for in-state green-job employment since renewable power can be imported out-of-state to comply with the mandate.
Lawmakers in these states with power mandates may now question the value of raising electricity rates on their state power consumers for the purpose of subsidizing “green” job creation in another state nearby. In the end, what this ruling has done is to unravel the problems and complexities with a market for renewables that has been created through government policies.
In a potentially crushing strike against advocates for renewable energy mandates, a federal court ruling recently raised the issue of constitutionality of major provisions of many states’ renewable energy mandates.
On June 7, 2013, U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) position against the state of Michigan (and other petitioners) in a disagreement over FERC’s proposal to distribute costs for new power lines to supply millions of megawatts of wind power in the Great Lakes area. Michigan believes that this plan would, in essence, require them to pay for expensive new power lines intended for transmitting renewable energy out of the state. Based on the law establishing Michigan’s 2008 Renewable Energy Standard, only renewable energy generated inside its state borders is qualified to fulfill Michigan’s obligation to utilize 10% of eligible renewable energy sources by 2015.
Speaking for the Court, Judge Richard Posner ruled:
“Michigan’s first argument—that its law prohibits it from crediting wind power from out of state in favor of the state’s obligated use of renewable energy by its utilities—trips over an unbreakable constitutional precedence. Michigan cannot, without violating Article I of the commerce clause of the Constitution, discriminate against out-of-state renewable energy (emphasis added).”
Thirty states, including the District of Columbia, have mandates on renewable energy that require electric companies to purchase a certain quota or percentage of renewable energy by a projected year. Just like Michigan which has a clear ban on wind produced in other states from being allowed into their mandate, other states also “discriminate” against out-of-state renewable power. When counting mandate compliance, several states count in-state power at a higher rate than out-of-state power, a practice popularly labelled as “multipliers”:
Delaware has a 300% credit multiplier for customer-sited, in-state photovoltaic (PV), a 350% multiplier for a specific offshore wind project, and a 150% multiplier for all other in-state wind projects;
Colorado applies a 1.25 multiplier for its in-state generation;
Michigan provides an extra 0.1 credit for projects that use state-available components and its local workforce;
Missouri grants a 1.25 multiplier for all in-state generation.
Kansas uses a 1.1 multiplier for all in-state resources;
Moreover, some state renewable policies have a list of renewable energy grades, where certain power sources can only be utilized to fulfill a part of the mandate. Others have grade levels dedicated particularly to in-state power generation that may now be doubtful in view of the recent decision by the federal court:
New Mexico’s Tier V applies to customer-sited resources;
Massachusetts’ Tier IV exclusively applies to in-state PV projects;
New York’s Tier II covers customer-sited resources.
The new ruling is significant since one of the main points raised by mandate proponents is the creation of jobs in the concerned state. Certainly, these claims merely consider the overall “green” jobs provided, while totally neglecting the loss of net jobs resulting from increased electricity rates arising from these mandates. The federal court ruling might just end up nullifying the argument for in-state green-job employment since renewable power can be imported out-of-state to comply with the mandate.
Lawmakers in these states with power mandates may now question the value of raising electricity rates on their state power consumers for the purpose of subsidizing “green” job creation in another state nearby. In the end, what this ruling has done is to unravel the problems and complexities with a market for renewables that has been created through government policies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)